TECH TALK: Poll automation a success; Low tech problems delays voting

Various doomsday predictions were quickly proven wrong at the close of the elections on

May 10, 2010 when results started pouring into COMELEC and PPRCV servers. The swift

counting due to the implementation of the PCOS machines and other technologies employed

by COMELEC and Smartmatic gave no time at all for dagdag-bawas operations which would

have been quite easy to do in the previous elections.

The random manual audit (RMA) also has shown no significant variations from the PCOS

counts. Only one more unofficial check remains: To review if the precincts included in

the RMA are not significantly different compared to those not audited. So far though, the

election results are looking credible and the PCOS machines proved to be accurate in the

counting.

The country was given positive feedback by foreign observers and the US and UK

congratulated us for the successful elections.

However, even with the successful automation of the ballot counting, the clustered precincts

suffered long lines and delays because the queue of voters was not managed well. Each set

of BEIs had different methods of managing the queue. The fastest moving queues where

those given priority numbers from 1 to about 1000. The slowest were those processed in

batch of 10s or 20s. The queue management was dismal in most precincts. We hope that in the next election, priority numbers should be part of the election materials

to be distributed by COMELEC. This is a low tech solution for a low tech problem. Also, a

holding room beside the precinct would be good also because it allows the voters who are

about to enter the precincts to relax and prepare themselves to vote. Priority numbers

would help avoid the long lines because it allows some voters to decide whether to go home

and come back later or stay on.

The election results were also published online on www.ibanangayon.ph and allowed

anybody with Internet access to review the results. Such transparency was made possible

by the technologies employed by Smartmatic and this should be a lesson for government

agencies and LGUs: transparency really removes concerns of cheating and corruption and

gives credibility to government activities like elections, purchases and others.

Share

Submit a Comment